And I so trusted it....
And I so trusted it....
By my car by proxy there went the acquaintance. It has had an accident
On the fault. The victim demands from me the indemnification. The acquaintance
To compensate harm refuses. Tell, who should compensate harm
To the victim?
N.Travkin.
Tula.
According to item 1 of item 1064 GK the Russian Federation "the harm caused to the person
Or to property of the citizen... Is subject to compensation in full the person,
Harmed ". From this article it is possible to draw a conclusion, that losses should
To compensate your acquaintance, that is the person who was at the wheel. But
It operated the car by proxy, given out by you. The proprietor of the car
- You. And according to item 210 GK the Russian Federation "the proprietor bears burden
Maintenances of property belonging to it ". Thus, the victim has
The right to demand a satisfaction from you, times the acquaintance goes obstinate. You in the
Turn have the right of the return requirement (recourse) to your acquaintance,
That is can insist, that it compensated you that sum, which you
Pay to the victim. If the acquaintance refuses, it is necessary to submit the claim
Petition.
Ulet, and only.
We with the wife came back home from holiday. At the airport to us have told,
That flight is postponed, the reason have not explained. Depart we could in two days.
Hotels was not, we have spent all this time in a waiting room without
Elementary conveniences. Whether we can demand indemnification?
S.Kostin.
Tambov.
The case which has occurred to you, is regulated by the Law "About protection of the rights
Consumers "by which responsibility in relations of the such is provided
Sorts. You with the wife are consumers of services of airline, and the company
- The enterprise-executor rendering services in transportation. In
Conformity from item 4 of this Law the executor is obliged to render service
To the consumer which quality corresponds to the contract. In our case
The contract is a ticket in which the departure exact times is specified. You have the right
To demand the full indemnification of all losses caused to you in connection with
Infringement of terms of rendering of service, including in the form of the penalty - 3
Percent from service cost for each delayed day (or hour, if
Time is defined in hours). But consider, that the requirement can not
To satisfy, if the airline proves, that infringement of term of a start
Has occurred because of force majeure (for example, non-flying weather). Besides
It, on the basis of item 15 of the same law you can insist on
Indemnifications of moral harm, in spite of the fact that the Air code the such
The right of passengers is not provided.
Sergey Hovanov,
The lawyer.
The Moscow union
Consumers.
//* an information Source: the Russian newspaper, 31.10.97
//* Reg. Nom. - 6071000234.55-------------------------------------------
|
|
Мини-гостиницы Санкт-Петербурга - отличительная черта города, как туристского центра, от других городов России. Мини-отели Петербурга, как правило, располагаются в постройках XVIII-XIX вв. Впервые они появились в Европе и сразу же стали символом гостеприимства и домашнего уюта, столь не хватающего гостям, находящимся на расстоянии от собственного дома. Если Вы хотите ощутить себя во время поездки в Северную Столицу как дома, то выбирайте мини- гостиницы Санкт-Петербурга.
|