The state is to you not MMM...
The state is to you not MMM...
In republic, including in Kazan, it is necessary to finish
Privatisation of objects of trade, public catering and household
Service. At least, by the end of year in the state
Properties should not remain any shop, a dining room or
Studio. All is assigned to private business.
There will be it in that case, of course, if the Cabinet
Offers of the Republican interdepartmental will be confirmed
The commissions on economic and social questions on the mechanism
Alienations of objects of the real estate of Kazan, being nowadays in
The municipal property.
It is supposed, that committees on management municipal
(COOKS) will be abolished by property, and powers on management,
To possession, using and the order the state property which was
Earlier in the municipal property, again will be passed
To the ministry of ground and property relations RT.
Our correspondent has met deputy minister Ildarom
HAJRULLOVYM.
- Ildar Sajfullovich! There is no doubt that the wide
Enterprise weights thirst for a long time for permissions of many
Urgent problems. It is better to own, as they say, than not
To own. Whether however will win the state of that objects
The real estate will pass in private hands?
- We work according to the Decree of the President about development
Small business where there is a point on end
Privatisations in branches of trade, household services and public
A food. Today in republic 80 percent are privatised
Objects of trade, public catering and consumer services.
It is possible to tell, that privatisation approaches end, but
Complexity in that it has passed basically without transfer
Premises which occupy the given objects. That is tables-chairs,
The equipment, computers and other property is redeemed by the new
Proprietors, and owners of premises, as a rule, remained
Administrations of cities and areas.
I will explain on an example of Kazan. In the beginning of privatisation we have passed
Capital administration thirteen largest objects of trade,
Including all regional auctions. On the basis of these passed auctions
Forty eight managing subjects - thirty have been created
Joint-stock companies and eighteen societies from the limited
Responsibility. And here almost half of these subjects is formed
Without inclusion in ustavnyj the capital of premises. And there, where premises
Are switched on, they are issued as the municipal property.
- It turns out, we have now three kinds of the property -
State, municipal and private?
- After definition of Supreme court RT concept "the municipal
The property "today basically it is illegitimate. There is a uniform
State ownership. In this connection law RT "About
State ownership and the property of the local
Self-management "is subject to reduction in conformity with norms
The civil legislation.
- Whether it is impossible to explain on a concrete example?
- Let's tell, joint-stock company "п п п?" was privatised together
With object of the real estate. Members of labour collective own
In thirty five percent of actions. Sixty five percent
Belongs COOKS. That is practically labour collective did not become
The owner of the enterprise. It is necessary to continue privatisation.
The municipal committee of Kazan has presented the schedule of realisation of these
The state shares.
At those enterprises where the premise has not entered in ustavnyj
The capital, is supposed in the future these premises too to expose on
Realisation. The repayment right of priority will be had by the tenant.
If it cannot use at once it, for object
To the real estate there is really nedeshevo, behind it this right
It will be saved within three years, and only then the premise will be
It is exposed on auction. And it is fair - object of the real estate
Will pass to the one who in a status it to buy and organise
On this base business.
- Whether it is counted, the treasury from privatisation how much will replenish
Premises?
- For us today this question not the most important. Our problem -
To create civilised conditions for development in republic small and
Average business. Single payments do not do weather. Much
The budget will receive the big injections in the form of the same tax
Deductions - in case of active and successful activity
Businessmen.
- COOKS have not justified themselves?
- I so have not told. They have been urged to operate the municipal
Property, and they were engaged in it. Passing in 1998 the rests
The republican property COOKS, we counted on acceleration
Privatisations. But it has not occurred. Now we come back to
To initial variant also we create territorial bodies,
Which we delegate powers on management of the state
Property, including on privatisation, rent and another
To questions.
- Know, even small interrogation of heads private
The enterprises has convinced me that process of the repayment of objects
The real estate not simply long (year or two!), but also it is terrible
The tiresome. Bureaucracy at us, know, it is invincible. Whether will be
This process transparent that to the official does not remain
Possibilities tsyganit a bribe?
- The exit to me sees only in auctions and competitions.
The transparency and openness to this process will guarantee and
The market estimation of the real estate made by the independent
The expert, and exhibiting to the auctions of premises, share holdings
Joint-stock companies.
- The priority with other things being equal remains for
The tenant, so?
- Yes. At it will be with acceptance of the corresponding decision
The governments the possibility guaranteed by the state three years
To accumulate means if he cannot redeem a premise at once.
- About what areas there is a speech? Whether separate this building or
Its part?
- Any area, even a small room in a building.
- However, as a rule, the house which does not have uniform owner,
It is quickly scattered. After all knowingly, speak, at seven nurses the child without
To eye.
- At sale our problem consists in, that the engineering
Communications and networks have appeared in hands of one owner. Someone
Should serve and be responsible for them them. That it has not turned out so,
That you have bought today a room in a building, and tomorrow to you will disconnect
Heating or light. The building entirely will be at someone on balance,
It out of doubt.
- At whom if, suppose, tenants hundred and everyone owns
Only a room?
- Someone from proprietors will incur. If does not take
Anybody, and liftovoe an economy, both a heat supply, and power
Maintenance will be passed to balance specialised
Public service.
- And if there will be somebody rich and impudent which will encroach
On a premise which the tenant just dreams to redeem in
Current of three next years?
- We try to live in a lawful state and we will come to it.
Dogovory purchase and sale which we conclude today, are made
According to laws in force. Any encroachments on
The rights of the proprietor understand a judicial order. The contract is
Obligations of the parties.
The state - same not the usual dealer in the market and not MMM,
Which will be dissolved in uncertainty. We also are the guarantor of the rights of all
Citizens.
- Here, say, I have bought hilenkoe a building in city centre,
And it is far not under the sickly price. But whose earth under mine razvaljuhoj,
On which I reckon?
- Today all earths under objects of the real estate -
The state. Under the legislation at building privatisation
The earth on which it costs, we give in termless using. But
The future ground code of such concept, as "using", already
Does not provide. Two statuses will be - the earth or in
Properties, or in rent. Each square metre will have
The owner.
Today in an agrarian question many unresolved problems. At
The enterprises at times it is impossible to find out even documents on
zemleotvod. It is time to us to get used to that in concept
"Real estate" enters also the earth. All over the world so - together with
The real estate gets also the earth under it. It also is a guarantee
That your property without your consent already nobody
Will take down or will not move only because the earth was necessary
Under road or garages.
- Let's assume, the proprietor of a building changes a profile: it is not pleasant
To it to hold hotel, it opens a brothel. What then?
- There are socially significant objects. At privatisation
Term of preservation of this or that activity makes a reservation.
Let's admit, for the given microdistrict important, that as early as five years
The private drugstore saved the profile. And if the owner with it not
It is considered, interferes and corrects it besides the state.
We have the right to return the state property in an initial status.
- Why collectives of the privatised enterprises do not hurry
To lay out last money for a premise?
- Because, as you have told, at them it is last money. And at
And those are not present some. A problem of end of privatisation
Rests against a financial and economic status of the enterprises. As
The rule, funds at many have become outdated, there are huge debts before
The budget. In republic more than hundred fifty trading enterprises,
Consumer services, public catering yet
Are privatised.
Having the territorial bodies, we, of course, will accelerate process
Also we will carry out a problem of privatisation of this branch. But all the same,
The coordination with heads of administrations will be not on a question,
To privatise or not, and how to privatise, what variant
Better. Agree, after all on a place is more visible, what decision
More effectively. Thus we will leave from errors of the first stage, that is
Let's simultaneously solve a question with the real estate. If at
Collective with a premise it is impossible, it will find to itself(himself)
The partner-investor, the one who is capable to help to develop to it
Business.
Raisa SHCHERBAKOVA.
<$>
//* an information Source: Republic Tatarstan, 28.07.01
//* Reg. Nom. - 1110700031.15-------------------------------------------
|
