Overbooking, or Search.
Overbooking, or Search.
In hotels often reserve numbers more than them exists
Actually.
When the average tourist faces a situation,
That in its hotel accommodation already someone have lodged two days
Earlier, he starts to blame turkompaniju and hotel for malicious intention and
Aspiration to plunder the consumer. Actually booking
Rooms in hotels and tickets aboard the plane over the existing
Volume - quite standard phenomenon. However, professionals do
It is imperceptible for the consumer, the others receive the judicial
Claims from the clients.
What is overbuking?
Definition of this concept is simple enough: overbuking is
Repeated booking or booking over any
Available limit. In a context of the tourist industry which are switching on in
Itself, besides actually tourist firms, also hotels,
The enterprises of a food, carriers and show business,
Real chances face with overbukingom can to be presented
There, where the client does the advanced order. First of all,
It concerns carriers (to airline especially often
Practise this technique of optimisation of incomes). Further, on frequency
"Accidents" placing means follow. Certainly,
Remains still possibility to face with a situation, when on yours
Place at theatre or the cinema sits somebody, having on hands same,
As well as at you, the ticket. But, you see, to change on another, let
Even less comfortable place is easier, than to transfer a start or
To remain without a hotel accommodation.
Carrying over of terms of a start, as well as absence of places in
Reserved (or promised to the client in agency) hotel,
Becomes one of the main reasons of discontent of tourists
Got turproduktom. Clearly, what is it the discontent is rare
Remains unexpressed, and even more often expression means
Dissatisfaction of the client got turpaketom becomes
Proceeding with all following consequences.
From told easy to draw a conclusion, what exactly hotels and
Airlines become object of steadfast attention at
Illumination of the questions connected with repeated bronirovanijami.
Why it occurs.
It would be most easier to assume, that airlines and hotels
Resort to reception of repeated booking due to negligence:
Like the cashier in theatrical cash desk which by mistake gives out
Two tickets for one place, employees of departments of booking in
Airlines and hotels do more advanced orders, than
They are allowed by an available limit because of control loss over
Real state of affairs. Not excluding theoretical possibility
Such course of the events, nevertheless the given assumption is necessary
To consider as as a whole not constructive, as
Universal distribution of computer technologies of booking
Brings such errors practically to naught. The assumption of the malicious
Intention of the personnel occupied with sales, also does not maintain
Critics in view of wide prevalence of the phenomenon. Really,
At all not having the exact statistics of quantity overbukingov (in
Hotel business it approximately 8-10 % over the available
Limit of numbers), it is possible to assert safely, that reception of the repeated
Booking - the phenomenon widespread. The one who time from
Time changed a habitual inhabitancy on time, for certain
Has about him the idea which has developed on personal observations or
Under stories of friends and acquaintances.
The reason, on which hotels and airlines reserve places
Over an available limit, lays in the nature of a product,
Offered to sale by these subjects of the tourist industry.
Specificity here consists that unlike the goods
Placing or transportation services cannot be stored or
To collect, as it is reflected in applied by experts for
Characteristics of this concept the term - "nesohranjaemost".
Really hotel reservations not sold today or
The plane (a train, the bus etc.) "are lost" for ever, as
Every days hotel room idle time (or places in the plane)
Are interfaced to certain costs which become covered only
At the expense of sales.
Overbuking and management of incomes.
The second specific to all sphere of service line is
High differentiation of a client stream as on
To solvent demand, and under behavioural characteristics.
The basic two groups by which all tourist is guided
Complex, are presented by business visitors and actually
The tourists, travelling group or individually with a view of
Rest and outlook expansion. It is considered to be, that business
Clients are inclined to carry out booking at the last minute and
Have possibility to pay the risen price for the got
Services. Tourists are characterised by the opposite tendency.
Necessity of maneuver between various client categories,
Their solvent demand and the existing offer, has generated
In the tourist industry new model of management. Its essence was
Concerning the simple: to make so that each client has paid
The greatest possible price for which he would agree
To use services of hotel got by it or
Airlines. So there was a management method incomes, or yield
management, the representing logic reception calculated
On improvement of return from number fund of hotel or base
Air courts of airline by forming of the market
Priorities and minimisation of risks of the loss from not sold in time
Services.
When it is possible to speak about risk at booking realisation? In
Application to hotel business managers have a problem
Managements of following risk factors:
Necessity of sale of all intended to sale
The number fund characterised nesohranjaemostju
("Lost" each 24 hours);
The facts of late annulment before made bronirovany,
And also the facts of that a quantity of clients,
Reserved rooms, will not use the order and not
Will cancel it.
Representatives face similar difficulties also
Carriers. In such situation one of management method receptions
Incomes consists in maximising sales on
To the optimum prices, including at the expense of practice overbukinga.
Actually hotels and airlines are offered to reserve
It is more than numbers, than is to avoid available
Listed above losses.
Management overbukingom.
Leaves, that process overbukinga is inevitable, as is connected with
The nature of the industry of hospitality. A conjuncture of the modern
The market forces carriers and experts of hotel business
To go on notorious infringement of rules of sales. But if specificity
Business forces to resort to such receptions, first,
It is necessary to take care of lowering, whenever possible, them
Negative consequences or to minimise arising in
Result of it a negative effect. Secondly, the manager,
Broken booking conditions, it should be ready for it
To "pay".
Speaking about consequences overbukinga, it is necessary to mean, that
They infringe on interests as the consumer, and the manufacturer
Services. About consequences repeated bronirovany for clients
Hotels and airlines further when it will be a question about
Legal aspects of this problem, it will be told in more details.
While we will try to answer a question on that, how much favourably
To airlines and hotels to apply such practice.
The positive aspect overbukinga is obvious to the last: it gives
Possibility to optimise incomes by quantity maximisation
Sales. But it is one party of a medal. The backspacing is presented
Certain negative influences, among which as
Moral aspects (loss of trust of client base and formation
Negative image), and more izmerimye
Financial and economic criteria. Them, in particular, concern
Compensatory payments and the penalties paid to the client, whose
The rights have been restrained, and losses of other plan. What it for losses?
Let's present such case: the hotel receives the order for placing
Groups of tourists (thus giving to tour operator
The corresponding discount for a sales volume). The manager accepting
The decision, faces to a choice: to refuse the order, as on
Term when group arrival is expected, a part of places already
It is reserved, or to resort to overbukingu. In the latter case
It will accept the offer, and simultaneously and the risk connected with it
Repeated booking of same numbers. Here it moves
Calculation, that someone from reserved rooms cancels in advance
The order or will not use services of placing in other reason.
Let alone that this calculation can not be justified with
All following consequences, the manager who has made a choice in
Advantage of the group order over an available limit, loses and
The enterprise of possibility to place other categories of visitors,
Consonants to pay higher price for hotel services.
Really, a situation when the visitor without the reservation is refused
In moving because of absence of places in hotel, not such
Rarity in modern foreign practice. Thus, considering
Difference in tariffs (the client reserving number in advance, receives
The discount, while the visitor buying number "from a rack",
Pays an all-round price), becomes clear, that means under
Word-combination of "loss of other plan". It is not necessary, probably,
To mention, that similar processes are characteristic also for
The enterprises of other spheres, practising booking over a limit.
To avoid losses from overbukinga, there is no another
Ways how to adjust the system allowing them to operate. In it
Sense the same manager making of the decision, will make it more
Precisely, if will know admissible limits of the repeated
bronirovany. Differently, it should define in advance, what
And under what price he can sell quantity of places, that not
To get to inconvenient position. Statistical data,
Collected on such categories, as quantity of late annulments
And absences, allow to reduce risk of possible losses considerably
From repeated booking, having foreseen "safe" quantity
Such reservations.
Legal aspect overbukinga.
Everything, that has been stated above, represented attempt
To look at a problem repeated bronirovany other eyes.
The vector of research interest in this case has been directed
On specific conditions of conducting business activity in the tourist
The industries considered from a position of the manufacturer of service. Accent
Has been placed in a similar way not casually, as
The manufacturer of services calls the given phenomenon by a life. If not
To understand the latent springs of the given process, the description of its displays
Will not approach us to the answer to a question "what to do?", on
The question "who is guilty?".
With last problem we, similar, were defined - "is guilty"
Specificity of sphere of services. And here what to do by that who became a victim
"Booking over a limit", it is possible to solve only after
Considerations of legislative treatment of similar infringements.
In the countries with the developed legislation protecting the rights
The consumer, and airlines pawn in advance hotels in
Expenses payment of indemnifications suffered from overbukinga to the client.
Situations when the hotel pays to the client moving by a taxi in
Other means of placing (sometimes higher class),
Which besides frequently also pays from the own
Means, let alone a free entertainment not placed
In time visitors, became daily practice in the EU countries.
Airlines incur not only the obligation to send
The passenger other flight or another, higher, a class, but also
"Are spent" for placing of the passengers who have not taken off in time.
By the way, the carriers, the first mastered practice overbukinga,
Similar, it is better than others from it and consult. Anyway,
Claims to the airlines which are especially carrying out the international
Transportations by regular flights, concerning the broken flight
Much less, than cases of trial with hotelerami.
The last is especially fair concerning those countries, where the rights
Consumers frankly neglect.
So, on some "east" tourist directions, where
Traditions of conducting business operations encourage not only the auction, but also
Various ways "concerning fair" otema money at
Having a rest foreigners, overbuking it is sometimes classified as
Possibility of reception of additional means from sale turpaketa
At the expense of deterioration of conditions of residing. Really, if group
At 30-50 the person even will stay one days in the three-stars
To hotel, instead of promised five-stars (where it has not appeared
Empty seats) "gain" of the operator will make not less
$1500-2500. Thus to "play" it is possible not only on "klassnosti", but
And on a hotel site, as peripheral hotels
Sometimes happen twice more cheaply the central colleagues.
If it has occurred, claims are addressed, as a rule,
To the tour operator, to the sold client turpaket. Trial
Its result is postponed before returning of the tourist home, and
Depends on the decision made by court and activity of the judicial
Executors. But on court it will be a question not about overbukinge as
That, and about infringement of treaty provisions, the prisoner between
The client and tour agency.
Overbuking and the Russian hotels.
In our country repeated room reservation in hotels,
When at a rack of the manager two face (or more)
The client with confirmed bronju on a same place,
It is represented more likely an exception, rather than a rule.
Prevalence of this phenomenon "stir" two circumstances: in -
The first, repeated booking assumes, that process of it
The booking has received a wide circulation. Secondly,
Hotels start to practise overbuking only when them
Loading comes nearer to 100 %. In our hotel
The validity coincidence of these two moments is observed
Seldom enough, if to abstract from "games" of directors
Means of placing and intermediaries in the market turuslug - a different sort
And scale of tour operators. But relations of legal bodies
Are regulated differently, than interaction legal and
The physical person, other scales assume also other methods
Decisions of disputes, that in this case is not a subject
Conversation.
As are protected by the branch legislation of the right and
Interests of the physical person who have faced the fact of the repeated
Booking? If to consider, that actually hotel
The legislation is presented not too widely, to be exact, all
One basic document - granting Rules
Hotel services in the Russian Federation, also legal
The comment of the given phenomenon will be shown to a minimum. Namely to
To the analysis vysheprotsitirovannogo the document on a subject representing
In this case the basic interest of article.
In "Rules" overbukinga the separate 23 point is devoted a problem,
Which will be expedient for quoting, that at the reader
There was an adequate representation about a way on which has gone
The domestic legislation in questions overbukinga. However
At once we will make a reservation, that the Russian branch legislation not
Operates with such terms, as overbuking or repeated
Booking. In our national context this phenomenon
Contacts "infringement of terms of the beginning of rendering of services on
To the contract on booking of hotel reservations ". And so, if the such
Has occurred, "the consumer at the choice has the right:
To appoint to the executor new term;
To demand price reduction for the rendered services;
To terminate the contract on service rendering.
The consumer has the right to demand also the full indemnification
The losses caused to it in connection with infringement of terms of rendering
Services. Losses are compensated in the terms established for
Satisfactions of corresponding requirements of the consumer.
The new terms of rendering of service appointed the consumer
Are specified in the contract on service rendering ".
Such edition of article tries to apply the general norms
Legislations on protection of the rights of the consumer to the hotel
To practice. However these attempts do not give required result.
Really, to the client who has got to a situation, when hotel
Refuses to place it, despite presence of the confirmed
The reservation, it is necessary not only monetary indemnification, but also real
Possibility to solve a placing problem. In this case the offer
"To appoint to the executor new term" looks no more than
Sneer, and council "to terminate the contract on rendering of services"
Represents not that other as a wish "to spit upon all and
To leave ", remembering that health is more expensive.
The Russian Rules only nominally protect consumers
Hotel services from possible negative influence of miscalculations
In the hotel policy bronirovany.
However for the sake of justice it is necessary to tell, that imperfection
Legislative base it is shown not only in the relation
Consumers of hotel services. Hotelery also suffer from
Absence of study of branch problems on the legislative
Level, but it already a subject of other conversation.
*п п я п?я - the chief of information-analytical department
Associations "University hotel, tourist, restaurant
Business ". Marina Smirnova*
<$>
//* an information Source: Russian focus, 10.06.02
//* Reg. Nom. - 1120600152.82-------------------------------------------
|
